Binance Loses $2.3B in Reserves Following BUSD Debacle

Erstellt von am in Test

• The SEC issued a notice to Binance USD issuer Paxos on Feb. 13 to stop further BUSD minting.
• As a result, investors withdrew around $2.3 billion worth of BUSD from Binance within four days.
• Binance reserves decreased by 16%, falling to around 12.1 billion tokens in the same period.

SEC Intervenes in BUSD Production

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requested Paxos, the issuer of Binance USD (BUSD), to stop further minting of the stablecoin on Feb. 13, 2021. This news caused investors to withdraw around $2.3 billion worth of tokens from Binance within four days, causing a 16% decrease in the exchange’s holdings of BUSD, which fell to roughly 12.1 billion tokens during that time period.

CZ Responds To SEC Notice

In response to the SEC’s intervention, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), CEO of Binance said that „Paxos will continue to service the product and manage redemptions.“ On the same day as CZ’s statement, Paxos announced that it would cease all new production of BUSD starting from Feb 21, 2023 onwards. Following this announcement, the price of the native token for trading on Binance (BNB) dropped by 9%.

CryptoSlate Coverage Of Event

CryptoSlate covered this event with an article titled „Binance reserves lost $2.3B following BUSD debacle,“ authored by Zeynep Geylan and published on Feb 17th 2023 at 5:50pm UTC+0:00 . The article provided an analysis of how investors reacted to the news and discussed changes in market prices following this incident as well as CZ’s response and updates regarding further developments with regards to SEC-Paxos interactions surrounding this matter.

Implications For Market

This event highlights some potential implications for cryptocurrency markets going forward into future regulatory interventions such as increased volatility in prices for related assets due to investor reactions and uncertainty about how events like these could impact crypto adoption more broadly over time if similar incidents were repeated or expanded upon by authorities internationally or domestically in different jurisdictions around the world where cryptocurrencies are traded or used for payments or other activities online or offline .

Conclusion

Overall, this incident serves as a reminder that regulators are paying close attention to cryptocurrency projects and exchanges operating within their jurisdiction; thus companies operating within these spaces should be aware of their obligations under relevant laws & regulations when launching products and services related cryptographically secured digital assets like Bitcoin & Ethereum etc.. Additionally , this case can inform investors looking into entering crypto markets regarding potential risks they may face when investing in digital asset projects that are not compliant with international regulations or local laws depending upon where they are located geographically speaking .